Confessions of an economic hit man: How the US uses globalization to cheat poor countries out of trillions

We speak with John Perkins, a former respected member of the international banking community. In his book Confessions of an Economic Hit Man he describes how as a highly paid professional, he helped the US cheat poor countries around the globe out of trillions of dollars by lending them more money than they could possibly repay and then take over their economies ...

JOHN PERKINS: Basically what we were trained to do and what our job is to do is to build up the American empire. To bring - to create situations where as many resources as possible flow into this country, to our corporations, and our government, and in fact we've been very successful. We've built the largest empire in the history of the world ... primarily through economic manipulation, through cheating, through fraud, through seducing people into our way of life, through the economic hit men. I was very much a part of that ... I was initially recruited while I was in business school back in the late '60s by the National Security Agency, the nation's largest and least understood spy organization ... and then [it] send[s] us to work for private consulting companies, engineering firms, construction companies, so that if we were caught, there would be no connection with the government ...

I became its chief economist. I ended up having 50 people working for me. But my real job was deal-making. It was giving loans to other countries, huge loans, much bigger than they could possibly repay. One of the conditions of the loan - let's say a $1 billion to a country like Indonesia or Ecuador - and this country would then have to give 90% of that loan back to a US company, or US companies ... a Halliburton or a Bechtel ... A country today like Ecuador owes over 50% of its national budget just to pay down its debt. And it really can't do it. So we literally have them over a barrel. So when we want more oil, we go to Ecuador and say, "Look, you're not able to repay your debts, therefore give your oil companies your Amazon rain [forests], which are filled with oil." And today we're going in and destroying Amazonian rain forests, forcing Ecuador to give them to us because they've accumulated all this debt ... [We work] very, very closely with the World Bank. The World Bank provides most of the money that's used by economic hit men, it and the IMF.

(Bron: http://www.democracynow.org/article...4/11/09/1526251)

Last but not least, oil producers also put their savings in Uncle Sam. With the "shock" of oil that restored its real price after the dollar valuation had fallen in 1973, ever-cleverer-by-half Henry Kissinger made a deal with the world's largest oil exporter, Saudi Arabia, that it would continue to price oil in dollars, and these earnings would be deposited with Uncle Sam and partly compensated by military hardware. That deal de facto extended to all of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and still stands, except that before the war against Iraq that country suddenly opted out by switching to pricing its oil in euros, and Iran threatened do the same. North Korea, the third member of the "axis of evil", has no oil but trades entirely in euros. (Venezuela is a major oil supplier to Uncle Sam and also supplies some at preferential rates as non-dollar trade swaps to poor countries such as Cuba. So Uncle Sam sponsored and financed military commandos from its Plan Colombia next door, promoted an illegal coup and, when that failed, pushed a referendum in his attempt at yet another "regime change"; and now along with Brazil all three are being baptized as yet another "axis of evil").

After writing this, I found that the good (hit) man Mr Perkins was in Saudi Arabia too:

Yes, it was a fascinating time. I remember well ... the Treasury Department hired me and a few other economic hit men. We went to Saudi Arabia ... And we worked out this deal whereby the Royal House of Saud agreed to send most of their petrodollars back to the United States and invest them in US government securities. The Treasury Department would use the interest from these securities to hire US companies to build Saudi Arabia - new cities, new infrastructure - which we've done. And the House of Saud would agree to maintain the price of oil within acceptable limits to us, which they've done all of these years, and we would agree to keep the House of Saud in power as long as they did this, which we've done, which is one of the reasons we went to war with Iraq in the first place. And in Iraq we tried to implement the same policy that was so successful in Saudi Arabia, but Saddam Hussein didn't buy. When the economic hit men fail in this scenario, the next step is what we call the jackals. Jackals are CIA-sanctioned people that come in and try to foment a coup or revolution. If that doesn't work, they perform assassinations. Or try to. In the case of Iraq, they weren't able to get through to Saddam Hussein. He had - his bodyguards were too good. He had doubles. They couldn't get through to him. So the third line of defense, if the economic hit men and the jackals fail, the next line of defense is our young men and women, who are sent in to die and kill, which is what we've obviously done in Iraq.

To return to the main issue and call a spade a huge spade, all of the above is part and parcel of the world's biggest-ever Ponzi-scheme confidence racket. Like all others, its most essential characteristic is that it can only continue to pay off dollars and be maintained at the top as long as it continues to receive new dollars at the bottom, voluntarily through confidence if possible and by force if not. (Of course, the Clausewitz and Cromer formulas result in the poorest paying the most, since they are also the most defenseless: so that the ones sitting on/above them pass much of the cost and pain down to them.)

Bron van het lijvige(!) basisartikel: http://207.44.245.159/article7778.htm Ik publiceer het onder het subforum: 'Achtergronden'... en ik verbind er daar ook 'een paar consequenties' aan...

__________________
"Never argue with an idiot, they'll just bring you
down to their level and beat you with experience." (c)TB

Tja... bussiness is bussiness bij die mensen he.

België zit in hetzelfde schuitje hoor qua schuldenlast. Je moest maar eens weten hoeveel beter? veiliger? mooier? België zou zijn moesten ze niet hun beide ledematen steeds afbetalen aan schulden en intresten...

Ok dat is een feit, maar we zijn het toch al beter aan het doen, we hebben al een begrotingsoverschot. We maken dus geen extra schulden meer op de schulden die we al hadden. Dus ik denk dat we op goede weg zijn!
(Allé voor hoe lang het nog duurt hé, dieje overschot)

"Going down, going down" - Zelfs drugsdealers stappen van de dollar af


Dat het al een tijdje niet zo goed gaat met de dollar, kan niemand ontgaan zijn. De euro breekt record na record, voor 1 euro moet nu 1,35 dollar worden betaald. En iedereen vraagt zich af of de dollar nu toch echt blijft zakken.


De val van de dollar betekent dat steeds meer investeerders ervoor kiezen niet in dollars af te rekenen, maar in andere valuta, die op het moment stabieler zijn. Dat kan erg pijnlijk worden voor de Verenigde Staten, waar het huishoudboekje voor een deel drijft op het feit dat er wereldwijd veel in dollars gehandeld wordt. Want elk honderd dollar biljet wat circuleert buiten Amerika is eigenlijk een lening aan de VS, die voor die honderd dollar buitenlandse valuta of producten terugkrijgt.

Dat in de officiële economie de dollar minder populair is, is al vervelend genoeg. Maar nu lijkt het er ook op dat in de informele economieën van drugshandel en zwart geld de dollar in populariteit afneemt. Steeds meer drugsgeld blijkt niet in dollars te worden verrekent, maar in euro's, onder andere omdat die die grote coupures te krijgen zijn. En dat is niet alleen makkelijker weg te stoppen en te smokkelen, momenteel is de kans dat het in de matras de helft van zijn waarde verliest, ook nog eens kleiner.


Bron: Slate.com: Euro Trash
http://www.slate.com/id/2111504/

__________________
"Never argue with an idiot, they'll just bring you
down to their level and beat you with experience." (c)TB

Steeds meer en meer oliesjeiks laten de dollar varen en beginnen met de euro te werken

Allemaal truukjes die men nu toepast. Via de EU is men wel verplicht om hier dringend iets aan te doen. En met bijvoorbeeld het Zilverfonds heeft men verschillende leuke manieren gevonden om het tekort voorlopig te doen minderen.

Het Zilverfonds gebruikt men bijvoorbeeld om begrotingsoverschotten in te steken. Met die bedragen kan men dan de schuldenlast verminderen. Het probleem is alleen dat wanneer men de fondsen van het zilverfonds gaat raadplegen men terug schulden gaat maken. Eigenlijk is het gewoon een beetje verschuiven van geld waar men op dat moment voordeel van heeft...