Enkele post bekijken
  #4  
Oud 19th April 2006, 23:34
Barst's Avatar
Barst Barst is offline
Administrator
 
Geregistreerd op: Jun 2004
Locatie: L'burg
Posts: 16,562
Citaat:
Orgineel gepost door wim leenaerts
Hoewel ik volgens mij ook niet wil dat hij met zijn hoofd gaat denken
Zou hij trouwens überhaupt af en toe wel eens nadenken?

Ik vrees van wel... zie uittreksel uit interview met Joseph Stiglitz, nobelprijswinnaar economie:


SPIEGEL: Before the invasion of Iraq, the US administration said the best way to keep oil prices in check is a short and successful war. A barrel was at $25 at that time, and now it's over $60. What of this increase is due to Iraq?

Stiglitz: In our analysis about the cost of war, we only assumed a modest $5 to $10 caused by the war. We wanted to keep our study conservative, so no one would dispute our numbers, and no one did. But I believe that's a vast underestimation of the true cost.


SPIEGEL: But why? China and India are increasing their demand, real global growth has been going on. This is driving the prices.

Stiglitz: When demand rises so does supply -- that's how markets usually work. Now we're seeing that demand for oil is rising but we're not getting a commensurate increase in supply. And there's a simple answer, it's Iraq. But it's not just because it production has been down.


SPIEGEL: Why else?

Stiglitz: The Middle East is the lowest cost producer in the world. They can produce oil for $10, $15 or $20 a barrel. Now we have the technology to produce oil elsewhere for $35 to $45. But who wants to develop fields or invest in new technologies elsewhere if they know that in five years' time, the Middle East may be supplying oil at previous prices?


SPIEGEL: In other words, were peace and stability re-established in the Middle East, the oil price would be back to maybe $25, despite the huge global hunger for energy?

Stiglitz: Yes. By the way that's the price level oil traders were speculating on in futures trading before the outbreak of war.


SPIEGEL: There should be huge economic pressure on Bush to end this conflict.

Stiglitz: The only people benefiting in this war are Bush's friends in the oil industry. He has done the American economy and the global economy an enormous disfavor, but his Texan friends couldn't be happier. The price of oil is up, and they make money when the price of oil goes up. Their profits are at record levels.


SPIEGEL: You don't like this president very much.

Stiglitz: Oh, it's nothing personal. It's all about his politics.

http://www.actualiteit.org/forums/showthread.php?t=8085

En wat was weer de naam van dat andere land dat baat heeft bij dure olie omwille van de hoge productiekost gekoppeld aan de eigen Brent-olie? Juist ja...
__________________
"Never argue with an idiot, they'll just bring you
down to their level and beat you with experience." (c)TB
Met citaat antwoorden