Rod Liddle criticises BBC for too much coverage of Nelson Mandela death
Spectator columnist Rod Liddle has criticised the BBC for devoting too much airtime to the death of Nelson Mandela, describing the story as "famous nice black man dies".
The former editor of Radio 4's Today, who is no stranger to courting controversy with his column in Fraser Nelson's magazine, prompted a storm of criticism on Twitter with his comments posted hours after Mandela's death. Liddle said: "For Christ's sake BBC, give it a bloody break for five minutes, will you? "It's as if the poor bugger now has to bear your entire self-flagellating white post-colonial bien pensant guilt; look! Famous nice black man dies! "Let's re-run the entire history of South Africa. That's better than watching the country we're in being flattened by a storm." He added: "Look; I'm sorry Nelson Mandela is dead. "It happens quite often to people in their 90s who have been very ill, even famous people, but I'm sure that doesn't lessen the sadness for many of us. I never met the man but, on balance, I came to the conclusion that he was a force for good rather than ill. "I think I came to that rather banal and broad brush conclusion 20 years ago, or maybe 15. So, I'm sorry he's dead, I wish it were otherwise." The column generated fierce criticism on Twitter, with users describing him as "odious" and "vile". Also on Twitter, Richard Garside published a "Rod Liddle decision tree", describing him as an "attention seeking wind-up merchant". Spectator editor Fraser Nelson, discussing Liddle in an interview with the Guardian earlier this year, said the most common reaction he gets from Spectator readers is "don't tone down Rod". "Twitter has got a habit of vastly amplifying the concerns of whose who have spent their lives being wound up," said Nelson. "Twitter is not the vox populi; it is a very effective way of getting a point across to a journalist. But there is a temptation in politics and the media to overreact to Twitter." The Spectator had to pay £5,625 in fines and compensation in June last year after a Liddle comment piece breached reporting restrictions during the trial of Stephen Lawrence's killers. The magazine had not responded to a request for comment at the time of publication. --- Bron: http://www.theguardian.com/media/20...ndela-spectator --- Mening: Ik kan er begrip voor tonen dat het wel wat 'te veel' kan worden. De man was en is een legende en is een gigantisch symbool over de hele wereld maar soms vraag ik me ook wel af hoeveel er verteld kan worden over de dood van een man. Maar het is gevaarlijk om dergelijke zaken te uiten vlak na de dood van Mandela omdat men dit weleens als oneerbiedig kan opvatten. Zelf stoort het me nu niet dat er zoveel over wordt gezegd, Mandela had niet de impact op mij als hij op vele andere miljoenen had dus ik weet niet in hoeverre mijn mening erover dus geldig is, mocht ik zeggen dat het teveel aan informatie erover me stoort. Maar in alle eerlijkheid was een item in het nieuws en een documentaire enkele dagen later over het leven van Mandela op Canvas wel voldoende geweest. |
Alle tijden zijn GMT +2. De tijd is nu 07:24. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.